Home > General > A real blog

A real blog

December 16th, 2003

I realized last evening, while munching on my delicious barbecue chicken from L&L Hawaiian Barbecue, that everything I dislike about the American ethos was summed up in two groups that were operating near me. To my right, at a set of Starbucks tables loosely cobbled together to accommodate a group of about ten people, were those sort of people who couldn?t seem to manage to keep their voices down or their opinions to themselves. This isn?t necessarily bad, but in this case it was. But that?s beside the point. As I mentally eased into their strident conversation, it became clear to me that these people, while they were discussing travel, had never actually traveled. The fat man with the bad moustache (Never! Never! No one looks good with a moustache!) was opining to his clan that when he and the lieutenant flew down to Fort Worth that one time, it was a [x] long flight and they should have got a [x] meal, [x]. Later it was noted that they flew Southwest, and I wanted to get up and smack the man with a glove or something. Aspect of the American ethos I dislike #1: expecting to be served.

The other group, located behind me and a few storefronts down, was the group of strikers in front of the VONS store. Now, in my opinion, trade unions have seen their day in the sun where they were not only useful, but vital. But that day is over. The original food-scanner-people strike may have had a legitimate purpose, but it quickly lost my support when I started seeing signs that said things like ?VONS Employees on Locked Out? ? if a movement cannot find someone in their ranks that cannot properly use the English language, they lose my support. It?s as simple as that. There are so many simple ways to make that sign work grammatically, it?s not even funny. Anyway, the people were standing in a circle between the two entrances, making no motion to stop people from entering the store. They were listening to a man who looked homeless explain why the corporate structure was out to get them, and how the man (he turns up everywhere, doesn?t he?) could end their careers with a phone call. They were so focused on being scared by a homeless man that they were forgetting to do their jobs of disrupting commerce. I?ve heard that unions pay people when they?re on strike ? does this seem at all odd to you? People generally strike for higher wages, or more bottom-line money in their pocket. These same people pay mandatory dues to trade unions that pay them to not work? If it didn?t have such a big following, I believe that qualifies as an extortion racket. The strikers characterize another portion of the American ethos that I can?t stand ? the idea of making a problem when there doesn?t need to be one. In military settings, it?s called sabre-rattling. Bush calls it pre-emptive striking or something equally inane. It?s patriotic when we do it, but the darkest of evils when someone else does.

In addition to making problems for no reason (the latest strike is over $15/week for health care coverage that was previously paid for by the store and is mostly subsidized by most companies), the strikers in front of VONS apparently were under the impression that they somehow had a right to interfere with other people?s lives. A socialist or a utilitarian would tell us that we should be concerned for the plight of our fellow man (don?t even start ? I?m saying man and I?m not going to be politically correct about it) as in the words of John Donne, ?no Man is an Islande, intire of itself?. But as a Libertarian and a rational person, I reject the idea that because someone is kvetching about having to pay $15 a week to have health insurance, when the vast majority of the health plan is subsidized by the company, that they somehow have a right to interfere with where I shop for what I need to live. Screw you, food-scanner-person. I?m not standing in front of the barber shop, asking people not to go in because my tuition went up again. There?s this thing called cost of living, and it tends to increase. Deal with it. I know a great place you can get a helmet.

I believe it is for many such reasons that citizens of other nations dislike the United States. I have to agree, I see the merit in their claims, all except for a few:

  • America is full of Zionists ? oh, wait, we do give more aid to Israel than any other country?
  • Americans are heathens ? well, for the most part that?s true. If I may extend the definition of heathens to that found in Islam ? an infidel, or one who is ungrateful ? I believe that manages to cover most people in America. This doesn?t mean that they have to be good Muslims or Christians or Jews or Anythings, just that there?s some kind of realization that sorry, bucko ? human?s aren?t the cat?s meow ? we?re imperfect and we don?t take time to recognize the perfection of the natural world around us.
  • America is a Christian nation ? by and large, I think most true Christians aren?t bad people. There are bad Christians, and there are bad atheists, but it really all depends on the philosophy rather than the doctrine. Sure, Christianity has its share of moral arbitrariness (don?t leave home without it!), but on the whole, the Christian faith tends to preach moderation, thankfulness, peace and understanding. Various branches get off in weird territory, and these branches ruin it for the other 98% of the population. They?re just as fundamentalist as the Taliban or al-Qaida, but no one pays attention to the fact because, by Jesus, they?re good Christians. (Random aside: Does the ?H? in Jesus H. Christ stand for ?haploid?, or the genetic state someone with only a mother and no human father would have?)
  • America is acting like the world?s policeman ? Yes. Because the United Nations doesn?t have enough international support to become its own real entity. I disagree with America?s actions, but something is better than nothing. Support the UN.
  • American pop culture is invading their cultures ? Again, yes. But take a look at how it?s invading: it?s on television, on the radio, and on the internet ? all things that can be turned off. If teenager like, then teenager get. I like pop culture for its continuously interesting reinvention of itself and its disposable nature (I?m not a planet-hater, I don?t actually like a ?throwaway? culture ? I mean that the music, views, and attitudes are completely dispoasable.) Some of the better aspects of pop culture have caught on: using Tupac Shakur to teach poetry, accepting differences between people as ?cool? rather than not, pushing limits with things like offensive T-shirts rather than doing something harmful, etc. It?s only a culture invasion if it?s forced, and if kids go for something because they like it, it?s hardly mandatory.

    So I guess there is merit in the claims of America?s detractors. You can be right if you?re not American. Go figure.

    Song of the day: John Digweed - Bedrock

    General

    1. No comments yet.
    1. No trackbacks yet.
    You must be logged in to post a comment.